Professional Albion Online Silver shopping Store, Cheap price, 10-Mins Delivery

Regarding the concentration of territories in alliances and the overall GvG unbalances

Hey everyone,

 

Lately we've been seeing a good bunch of complaints about GvGs, so I'd like to bring a new idea to deal with some of the issues around it (not my original concept, credits goes to a guildie of mine).

The issues:

- High concentration of territories on a handful of guilds;

 

- Very unbalanced GvG matches and the "ping pong" of guilds on resource territories;

 

- The whole town plot situation.

 

The proposed solutions:

- Remove negative defender bonus from the game.

 

- (THE ACTUAL IDEA) Add a system in which every guild or alliance has X (40 maybe?) positive defender bonus to spend on its territories. The guild or alliance chooses which of its territories will have positive defender bonus, and how many. The guild/alliance distributes the bonus freely (which can be removed by raiding and regenerate over time - there should also be some kind of cooldown to limit the re-distribution. Guilds wouldn't be allowed to redistribute bonus to a territory being attacked, of course).

 

Explanation:

- On the first idea: the ping pong of guilds on a territory creates a very unbalanced environment in which no real competitiveness exists. I've read again and again guilds trashtalking about how they played with -5 or -10 bonus and it was unfair. GvGs should be a the place of levelheaded PvP, but a virtual buff/debuff completely destroys that. More, the debuff allow guilds to "smartly" use it by losing a territory and taking back next without much effort. Removing negative bonus would implement a real competitive scenario and allow the actually better guild to win.

 

- On the second idea: guilds concentrate territories that are very hard or almost impossible to take due to a few reasons, namely:

a) They are good and should be rewarded for that. Nothing to argue here. Better guilds/alliances should win and have more territories. Working as intended.

b) Attacking routes are badly designed on a way it's almost impossible to reach certain territories/guilds protected by others.

c) High defender bonus of town plots make it very hard (specially in yellow zones against semi-competent guilds) to take. This means guilds that bought or stacked town plots early in the game have no concern of losing it. As consequence very few guilds have town plots.

 

Now, putting aside the reason "a", which is fair, reasons "b" and "c" should not be a factor on a competitive scenario. This new system I'm proposing would protect small guilds and their town plots/territories (which is, I believe, the intention of the DEVs with the defender bonus) and keep the territories of large guilds/alliances fighting more "volatile", susceptible to fair/balanced disputes. It'd also be a way to better spread the territories between guilds/alliances (specially town plots). This way small guilds would still have their territory protected by a defender bonus while giant alliances would depend on skill to defend theirs.

 

Changing the attacking routes or allowing guilds to "skip" a territory in order to attack another would also be a valid idea to complement the past one, but I'll try to keep it out as it is another discussion for perhaps another thread.

Related News
18
Jul

Fast Travel for the New World opinions

I would like to personally see boats and ships in game, but crafted by players. These should take some time to build and need lots of materials

07
Apr

Albion Senior player views on albion online builds

I really want to say, game doesn't require skill. It's runescape... Game requires time/patience/grinding/zerg tactics.

02
Sep

This is very much the premise of albion as well and alpha felt equally dangerous

As a Albion Online player you're inclined to do what's most effective, and right now there's far too many safe zones allowing players to progress.

16
Dec

This has the same effect as many games before Albion Online where traveling is simplified

It nullifies so many things Albion Online is suppose to have going for it. The world becomes so much smaller and territory so much more insignificant.

25
Apr

I'd like to talk about albion what I think can improve

I will be putting some points that I think are subject to change, for better balance and dynamism in the game. Wanted opinions and assistance regarding to these ideas actually come to have some impact

19
Aug

Albion Online is not rewarding enough

While i only can tell from my experience with AO since Veteran final beta launch, there are already the signs of demise with this game as well.

Comment
Leave A Reply

Albionmall Top News

02
Mar

Albion Online Build Guide: Vampiric Build by AlbionMall

Not saying its best build in game but must alert that I never had problems in open world vs any bow user.

08
Dec

Albion Online Guide on how to survive solo fame farming (T5+) PART 2

If you are trying to farm at one of the first T5 spots you found chances are so is everyone else. Players are lazy and don't want to have to look for mobs (see #6) they want to travel out 1 zone and start farming.

02
Dec

Beginners Albion Online Guide to Weapons and Armor in Classless PvP

Someone asked how to tell what your enemies will be doing in PvP. Well, it's hard to tell what defines each type of weapon and armor without clicking through every item on the destiny board, so here's a quick breakdown of what makes each item unique!